Background
In the Swedish context, the conference issue is extremely up-to-date, due to significant policy efforts to build youth prisons for offenders aged 13 to 17 at scale, with the goal of having them ready by July 1, 2026. Until the autumn of 2023, the Swedish National Board of Institutional Care had been responsible for managing the punishment of young people aged 13–17 who were convicted of serious crimes. Since that date, responsibility for this group has shifted to the Swedish Prison and Probation Service (hereafter SPPS). From now on, young people will serve their sentences in specially adapted youth prisons set up within regular prisons (Regeringen, 2023).
This organisational change reflects the influence of the contemporary debate on tougher sentences for children and young people, as well as the need to prioritise punishment over care for those who have committed serious crimes (Regeringen, 2025). When the youth prisons open, young people will become a new client group in the prison system. There are several reasons behind this policy change. In recent years, serious crime has increased among children and young people in Sweden. The number of children convicted of such offences has tripled since January 2023 (Zandén, 2025). Sweden stands out in the statistics of young people committing serious offences, especially in the context of a decline in crime among young people more generally (Svensson & Oberwittler, 2021). The young age of the perpetrators and the severity of the offences raise questions of prevention: what measures should be adopted to curb such crime and how punitive should those measures be?
Moreover, historical and international evidence underscores the fact that education provided during a period of detention is crucial to the rehabilitation of convicted young people. Unfortunately, in this, it is very little known for the contemporary Swedish context. To exemplify this problematic knowledge gap: The new client group of young people sentenced to time in a youth prison will meet educational prison officers and teachers during their stay. The role of these professionals is to encourage young people into education, simply said, to mould the young offenders into functioning citizens and to prevent their return to crime after their stay in the institution.
This highlights a necessary research focus of educational and special educational responsibility within closed institutions, where inmates require individualised education and social support to cope with life after institutionalisation (Fickler-Stang, 2023; Krause & Wittrock, 2021). Moreover, it reactualises the eternal debate surrounding youth detention: the complex and confusing relationship between education and coercion. From a research perspective, as outlined in the planned conference, important and challenging questions arise about how various requirements for designing an education system can be effectively implemented in a youth prison, as well as how education can prevent young people from reoffending (Knop, Fickler-Stang, & Zimmerman, 2022).
However, debates about youth prisons and the forms they should take are not new or particular to Sweden or elsewhere. Consequently, historically and internationally, several approaches to the mentioned issues have been discussed. The justification for this international conference is to bring together representatives from various knowledge bodies with expertise in youth criminality, juvenile justice systems and education in them, spanning different national contexts. This can provide valuable insights when systematically related to the contemporary situation in Sweden.